Photo of Erinn Contreras

Erinn Contreras is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's San Francisco office and Co-Leader of the Chambers-ranked Construction Team.

Retention payments are a longstanding practice in construction contracts, serving as a form of financial security for project owners to ensure proper and timely completion of work. It is typical for Owners in private work contracts to withhold up to ten percent (10%) from each payment owed to contractors and subcontractors. While this practice was intended to guarantee quality and incentivize completion, it often resulted in considerable financial stress for contractors and subcontractors, particularly in an industry characterized by slim profit margins and steady ongoing obligations for payroll, benefits, and material costs. Recognizing these challenges, California legislators introduced and recently passed Senate Bill 61 (“SB 61”) to update retention laws for private construction projects, with the stated goal of fostering greater fairness and financial stability across the construction industry.

Continue Reading California’s SB 61: New Limits on Retention Payments in Private Construction Contracts

Amidst the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, daily and sometimes hourly changes in federal, state, and local orders and regulations are significantly impacting the construction industry.  This blog provides an overview of practical issues to consider related to your California construction projects in light of the ever-changing landscape.
Continue Reading California Construction in the Time of Covid-19

On May 14, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co., No. S231549, slip. op. (Cal. Sup. Ct. May 14, 2018). In it, the Court narrowly construed the “good faith” exception to the general rule that a direct contractor must make retention payments to its subcontractors within 10 days of receiving any retention payment. The exception provides that “[i]f a good faith dispute exists between the direct contractor and a subcontractor, the direct contractor may withhold from the retention to the subcontractor an amount not in excess of 150 percent of the estimated value of the disputed amount.” Cal. Civ. Code section 8814(c).
Continue Reading It’s All a Matter of [Statutory] Construction: Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets the Good Faith Dispute Exception to Prompt Payment Requirements in United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.

It is industry standard in California for owners of a construction project to make monthly payments to a contractor for work it has completed, less a certain percentage that is withheld as a guarantee of future satisfactory performance. This withholding is called a retention. Contractors generally pass these withholdings on to their subcontractors via a retention clause in the subcontract. Under such clause, if a subcontractor fails to complete its work or correct deficiencies in its work, the owner and the general contractor may use the retention to bring the subcontractor’s work into conformance with the requirements of the contract.
Continue Reading “Good Faith” May Not Be Good Enough: California Supreme Court to Decide When General Contractors Can Withhold Retention